So we set out today, Wednesday November 9, to tour the Old
City of Jerusalem and to go to the Dome of the Rock. We started out early, as it promised to be a
long day. We met down at breakfast at
about 7:30 so we’d be ready to go at 8.
That was good, since we mostly avoided the big groups that are in the
hotel. This hotel, the Mount David, is
awesome.
So anyway. We were stuck at the wall, waiting for the
checkpoint stuff to clear. The
conversation in the van turned to Obama and Sarkozy and Palestinian Christians
and Muslims and their relationships to each other. I think the Obama “slip” shows that he does
have an understanding that he’s dealing with Israelis who have a hidden agenda
and may not be forthcoming in their negotiations. Regarding the relationships between Christians,
Muslims, and Jews, we were told that traditionally, that relationship had been
good but has deteriorated since 1948.
So we entered the old city through the Dung Gate, and
decided that if we were lost, that’s where we’d meet up. The Dung Gate, incidentally, is where I got
the Israeli police hats. As usual, we
discussed the Israeli settlements, the Geneva Convention, and their illegal occupation
of the West Bank. (In a nutshell, they’re
there illegally, in violation of the Geneva Convention, and building in an
occupied territory is CERTAINLY illegal.
They maintain that possession of the land is theirs because they took it
from Jordan who was not legally in possession of it.) We talked about the formerly progressive
Labor party and the conservative Likud party, and how, contrary to what one
would have thought, illegal settlements have actually grown under the Labor
party.
The Dome of the Rock was closed, so we went to the Western
Wall and then headed off to Masada.
On the way, we passed through Ein Gedi, noting that
references to it can be found in 2 Samuel (David goes through it) and in the
Song of Songs. A Gedi is a kind of Ibex,
though we never saw any. Josephus, the
historian also talks about Ein Gedi, and talks about the defenders of Masada. (By this time, I think we’d made it to
Masada). The defenders of Masada are ruthless, and the attack on Ein Gedi
occurs on Passover (more on this later).
We learned that the Sadducees, Pharisees, Zealots, and Essenes were the
four groups Josephus refers to.
The Sicarii are also a group at Masada. Josephus appears to suggest the Sicarii were
some sort of anti-Roman terrorist group who wanted to violently expel the
Romans from the area. When they were
unsuccessful, they spent the rest of their time on Masada (which means “mountain
fortress.”).
The group went down to look at Herod’s winter palace, while
I sat to try and collect my thoughts. While
Masada represents a rallying point in modern Jewish national identity, there
also appears to be archaeological and historical evidence to suggest that these
folk were the Sicarii, the terrorist group that wanted Rome destroyed and
wanted to kill all Israelites who cooperated with Rome. The fact that they (the Sicarii) committed
mass suicide is not heroic; it’s acknowledgement that their mission
failed. Peter sees parallels to the mass
homicide/suicide that happened on Passover after a failed mission with the fact
that Judas killed himself on Passover after betraying Jesus. I’m not quite sure I can make that
connection.
But I do realize that Masada is a indisputable archaeological site because it
shows us how Romans defended themselves (there was an outer wall that, in times
of peace could be used as living quarters, but in times of war could be filled
with rocks and used to fortify the walls surrounding the location); how they
relaxed (the preserved frescoes, the bathing rooms with hot, medium and cold
baths, the vaulted ceilings so the condensation didn’t drip on you in the steam
rooms, and the system for heating the sauna, with underground water and
terra-cotta pipes on the walls. Really
pretty amazing).
Another guide was talking about ritual suicide. His version, and presumably the “company line,”
was quite different than Peter’s version.
The group has gone down to see Herod’s palace. While I passed (too many steps for me), I do
note that I can go down steps without holding the handrail and without my cane.
I couldn’t do that when I left NYC; we’re supposed to be working on that in my
last three Physical Therapy classes. So
I guess I’m making some progress with these old knees.
We stopped at the bottom of Masada for snacks. I was relieved to see large coffees, and
ordered one. I got a medium. Then I went over to get ice cream. I got passion
fruit and pecan. It was 18 NIS. I gave
the guy two 10 shekel coins. He claimed
he didn’t have any change. I wonder how
much he makes every day with that racket?
So then we went on to Qumran, the site where the Dead Sea
Scrolls were originally found. I posted
last night about seeing the Scrolls in the Israel Museum. So the folk at Qumran, the Essenes, rejected
the Temple Cult (the Pharisees and Sadducees).
Among other things, they adopted a solar calendar instead of a lunar
calendar. But they saw themselves as the
true Israel.
We’ve talked a bit about this term Israel. The ancient
Israelites, the “Israel” referred to in the Bible, were a People, not a
Place. This People self-identified as
Israelites, although others have referred to them with various labels,
including “Judean.” From this term “Judean,”
we apparently get the modern appellation “Jewish.” The problem is that the ancient Israelites were
a fairly diverse mix of Ancient Near Eastern people. Over time, people who have been labeled “Judean”
have been expelled from various places around the world. They’ve come together under the umbrella term
Jewish, which would be fine except that there now appears to be an attempt by
this group of people to assert that they have a right to “return” to the lands
inhabited by the original Israelite people.
I ain’t tryna be racist, y’all. I’m
saying that it’s crazy to think that a bunch of people of European descent have
a “right” to return to the Middle Eastern land once inhabited by the Ancient
Israelites. If that’s the case, then
instead of funding them, the US Government needs to make arrangements to give
me my 40 acres and a mule here in the US, and/or make clear the way for me to “return”
to anywhere I choose in Africa and then support that economy. Oh, that would be neither logically sound, morally
right nor economically feasible? Well,
then….
After Qumran, we went on to Jericho. Jericho is the oldest continually inhabited
City in the world. I think the figures
are that Jerusalem has been continually inhabited for 6,000 years, and Jericho
has been continually inhabited for 8,000 years.
It is also the lowest permanently inhabited city in the world, at about
820 feet below sea level. We had lunch
in the Arab quarter. The group raved
about it; I wasn’t really impressed. It
was just ok. Thankfully, it wasn’t the
lavish spread we’d been accustomed to getting.
So we went to see the Tel Es Sultan, which is by the Spring of Elisha
(where Elisha sweetened the water). This
area has been continuously inhabited for 8,000 years. This was what we saw of Old Testament
Jericho.
Then we went on to New Testament Jericho. We passed by Herod’s winter palace. We saw a place where there’s an unexcavated
structure of something like a horseracing track with an amphitheatre, but it’s
on private property and won’t likely be excavated soon. We also went back to the Sycamore tree that
Zacchaeus climbed. We read the passage
from Luke 19:1-10, where Peter reads “Jesus” was small in stature. He does this because, he says, the original
Greek does not state who the “he” is. I
wonder if the Greek has a linguistic rule like English, where a pronoun without
a definite article is assumed to refer to the last noun referenced. Or something like that. I don’t know Greek grammar well enough to
debate the point, and so didn’t choose to bring it up there.
The point Peter wanted to make, which is a valid one, is
that interpretation and translation modify the text. Peter’s assertion is that in the original
Greek, “he” is not definite. (See
question above about rules of grammar regarding referents without definite
articles). We translate through
tradition, and our readings of the text are often informed not by what the text
says, but by what our tradition says. I need to find that passage in the Greek
and read it.
From there we went on the Old Jericho Road. That was amazing, full of twists and turns
and crevices. It did illuminate the Good Samaritan story. We stopped at St. George’s monastery, which
is nothing short of breathtaking.
We’re back in the hotel; I’m uploading pics, and then will
pack. We’re up at 6 tomorrow, off to the
Old City at 7:30, and then on to Jordan.
It’s been a great journey so far!
No comments:
Post a Comment